Home sweet (hemp) home

December 5 is UN World Soil Day. The building industry has thus been called to account for its role in the massive use of mineral raw materials and environmental pollution. One solution comes from the bio-construction sector which draws on unlimited sources of natural materials such as hemp, which is a recyclable carbon sequestrator. But how comfortable is it to live in a hemp house?

Building with wood, straw, and hemp. Biobased materials are seeing ever more use in the construction sector, which needs to become more sustainable as it is one of the major sources of soil, air and water pollution.

Forty percent of global raw material is consumed by the building industry. Fifty percent of CO2 emissions into the atmosphere come from the construction sector,” reports Italian bio-construction expert Paolo Ronchetti. Moreover, “Traditional building and insulation materials – of mineral or synthetic origin – are rarely recyclable. At the end of their life they are disposed of in landfills. Therefore, besides having an important environmental impact for their production, they have an equivalent environmental impact for their disposal.”

Biodegradable and from unlimited sources. Instead of exploiting the earth’s crust, and using a process that consumes energy and pollute, the bioconstruction sector can get its materials from the field. Hemp is one of the best examples; it can be grown in crop rotation and improves the quality of the soil. The plant is also a “carbon sequestrator”: it grows very quickly and acts as a carbon store, absorbing atmospheric CO2 for as long as it continues to exist.

Ronchetti adds: “You should consider that one cubic metre of a brick made from hempcrete – a hemp and lime biocomposite – instead of emitting C02, and polluting, it captures 20 kg of CO2 from the atmosphere. A cubic metre of low-density hempcrete biocomposite, which is sprayed to insulate roofs or subfloors, can remove 60 kg of CO2 from the atmosphere. So you can imagine – with the volumes and the numbers in the construction industry – how much this virtuous model of building with hemp and lime can fight climate change.”

To note, in the past, industrial hemp was banned in many countries because it was associated with illegal marijuana, from which it differs as the psychoactive compound ‘THC’ is present in proportions of below 0.2%. A thriving industry was consequently stopped. Now hemp farming is flourishing again.

This material also has other advantages. It allows builders to make high-performance envelopes and offers more comfortable, healthy and energy-efficient houses. Furthermore, the traditional building industry has increasingly used synthetic and chemical products that can be toxic and hazardous to human health. Tough low allergen design using natural materials is becoming a new trend.

Northern Italy, Chiari, near Brescia. “In the Po Valley summers are terribly hot and humid. Winters are cold and damp. Humidity rules here!’’ says Sara Bordiga. His husband, Mauro Cogi, longed for an eco-friendly home, and started studying all the available possibilities on the market. Finally, he opted for hemp and in 2015, Mauro and Sara moved into their new biobased house with their child.

“My husband’s choice really surprised me. I had never heard about hemp houses!” says Sara.

Mauro, an engineer, personally followed all the building phases. “The hemp technology works very well. I wrapped the whole structure in this monobloc hemp envelope, thus avoiding thermal bridges.” It’s monobloc because they didn’t use bricks, the hempcrete was sprayed directly onto the structural walls.

As this natural material is porous, it allows the building to “breathe”, avoiding any stagnant humidity. It also keeps a consistent temperature, thus cutting heating and cooling costs.

“Unlike what happens in homes with traditional polystyrene cladding, which doesn’t let moisture out, hemp allows good air exchange. This leads to very dry walls and high environmental comfort,” explains Mauro. “In this house, whose heating and cooling systems are only electric, the maximum power required is 1.8 kW, which is little more than a hair dryer. And with this 1.8 kW I can cool or heat 180 square metres.”

“Zero mould. Zero moisture,” confirms Sara. “And we’re doing well! There is a good level of comfort, we live well in terms of air and well-being.”

Hemp mixed with lime is the usual solution to insulate this kind of building. But European researchers, working on the project called Isobio, went further and developed a lighter but more rigid panel, with improved thermal conductivity. Thanks to innovative biobased binders, whose formula is still a secret, there’s no need for lime. This solution has breakthrough potential in the building sector.

Mike Lawrence, professor at BRE Centre for Innovative Construction Materials, University of Bath, UK, explains: “This material is the major innovation. It is a mixture of the hemp shiv – the woody part of the hemp stock – and it’s been mixed with the thermal setting binder which is also biobased, to make something which is rigid but strong… Much much stronger than you will get with hemp lime, which is much more brittle material. And it’s a lower density than hemp lime, and it’s much more flexible in the possibilities.’’

“The other innovation is a low density, a low thermal conductivity render, and that’s made up with also hemp shiv but it’s very fine. And this is mixed with lime. But because it’s so fine and because of the formulation of the lime, you end up with a render which is very high performance, very low thermal conductivity, much much better than a normal lime render. It’s laid in two layers, it’s got a reinforcement, it’s a sort of plastic grid which is put in between the two layers just to stop it cracking. And on the top – when you put these layers on – you put a standard lime plaster, a lime render which provides the resistance, the full resistance to the weather. Because hemp has the ability to absorb and desorb humidity, on the outside when it’s raining you don’t want that, so you put this out of surface, which will stop the water coming in,” he adds.

“Between the panels we put a fibre insulation. This insulation is made up primarily of recycled cotton, and it’s also got fibres from flax and from hemp,’’ Lawrence concludes.

The researchers are testing these and other innovations in different climates, in Spain and in the UK. They installed their composite panels in two demonstration buildings in Seville and in Wroughton, and now they are monitoring applied solutions. According to their results, they can achieve 20% better insulation performance than conventional materials, 50% less embodied energy and CO2 emissions, 15% reduction in total costs.

Oliver Style, energy consultant and researcher for Isobio says: ‘’I think that the real innovation is bringing together biobased materials, a lot of which have been used in traditional constructions for centuries, and applying modern solutions to make them fire-resistant, water resistant, to make them bind well and combining all of these different materials in a prefabricated wall system, which can be industrialised. I think up to now a lot of biobased construction has been very small scale, it’s been in the field of people who are very committed to biobased buildings, but it’s quite small scale, quite bespoke. So what we’re trying to do is create scalable solutions that can be built at industrial scale and which can make all of the requirements of the marketplace regarding thermal performance, fire performance, resistant to different weather conditions.’’

The composite panels should enter the market by the end of the decade. These biobased materials are expected to become ever more competitive in the next years, as the European Union requires all new buildings to be “nearly zero-energy”, which means very high energy performance, by the end of 2020.

By Loredana Pianta

27 November 2018

Journalists can download the video teaser and the BROLL [11’, original sound] in HD quality and scripts, free of rights and charge, here: mediacenter.youris.com

Bio-homes to tackle the housing emergency

A new sustainable initiative in Bristol, in the UK, uses bio-based materials to face the need for additional and affordable housing supply

Bristol is at the forefront of high-tech innovation in the UK, named European green capital in 2015. But it is also the second least affordable major British city housing-wise only after London.

Its estimated population is 454,200 people, according to the Office for National Statistics (ONS). Around 10,000 people are registered on the waiting list for a council home. There is a serious housing problem affecting both the young and the old.

To face the emergency, the Knowle West district is testing a new solution that is eco-friendly at the same time. We visited this neighbourhood in the south of Bristol, to discover how a community is trying to make possible a sustainable, affordable housing model using bio-materials.

The initiative, called We Can Make, gathered architects, designers, academics, policy makers, and residents. The result is a prototype house built on the grounds of a community centre, with the cooperation and participation of locals in the construction, plumbing, handmade carved furniture, art, and interior design.

The TAM (Transportable Accommodation Module) was designed and built using bio-materials such as straw, compress straw, and timber. These carbon capturing materials  minimise their environmental footprint.

The building is cool in summer and warm in winter, saving hundreds of pounds per month in air conditioning and heating. Actually, as soon as we entered the house, the temperature and the moisture in the environment were right despite the cold weather and rain outside.

According to Dr. Charles Gamble, our guide and head of Innovation at Stramit International, which is part of CooBio company, the TAM uses 90 percent less energy to heat and light when compared to the UK average.

Dr. Charles Gamble, head of Innovation at Stramit International, shows samples of the compressed strawboard panels used in the TAM (By Susan Fourtané)
Dr. Charles Gamble, head of Innovation at Stramit International, shows samples of the compressed strawboard panels used in the TAM (By Susan Fourtané)

The panels are made of compress straw and strawboard framed in timber and covered in clay,” he told youris.com. “Compress straw board has been around for almost 70 years since the technology was invented in Sweden in 1950. The process, also developed in the UK, provided building materials for more than a quarter million houses from the 50s to the 70s after which it became impossible to compete with plasterboard,” he added. These natural retrofitting solutions are also currently being tested at demonstration sites in the UK (Bath) and Spain (Seville) under the EU project Isobio.

Residents who have tested the TAM space overnight have reported that they slept better than usual, which is attributed to a good quality of air in the ambience. External people can rent it through Airbnb, and the income goes to the community centre.

“It’s the breathable nature of the building,” confirmed Finlay White from ModCell, which provided the straw panel systems, when we asked the difference from the traditional Victorian houses in England. “Around the windows in the buildings you don’t get condensation. This is one of the health benefits of using bio-materials,” he explained.

“The mapping of the Knowle West area identified thousands of small plots of land where TAMs could be put to relieve the housing situation for many of the families here who are stuck, because they have no employment or they’re too old. Sometimes you have three or four generations living in a small house,” Gamble said.

“A salary is £23,000 a year. The average price house is 8.4 times that,” added White, while the TAM cost for 36m2 is £90,000, with both leasing and hire purchase options.

IMG-2186

“What ‘We Can Make’ offers is a model that can be replicated in other regions involving local communities to develop in spaces that they privately own or the council owns, constructing the TAM systems locally to solve housing crisis,” said Gamble.

The team intends to place the houses approximately 200 metres from the community centre, hiring local people to help build the panels creating about 21 jobs in the location.

According to White, there have been identified 1500 potential sites in this area with seven similar more estates in Bristol, and “there are estates like these all over the UK that have the same housing issues.”

A report, We Can Make: civic innovation in housing, was released in October 2017 at the Festival of the Future City in Bristol. The project is in conversation with eight more councils around Britain where TAMs could potentially be built.

 

By Susan Fourtané

Photo credits: Stramit International

ISOBIO Panel for New Buildings

The new building insulation system can be divided into the following compartments:

  1. Structural frame + BioFib insulation.
  2. OSB3 panels
  3. Intello Proclima
  4. Timber battens (service void) + BioFib insulation material
  5. CSB panels
  6. Clay plaster
  7. ISOBIO rigid panels
  8. Hemp lime render

These are all sandwiched together to form the new building’s panel. It can be constructed in the following order:

  1. The wood studs are joined together using screws to form a structural frame with a 600mm interaxial distance between profiles. The height of the frame can be adjustable to the structure dimensions and the void is filled with BioFib Trio insulation material.
  2. After, OSB3 panels are fixed to the frame using nails or screws and a Intello Proclima membrane is attached to OSB3 panels using staples.
  3. Timber battens are added on above it using screws. They are installed horizontally again vertical disposition of the structural frame. A BioFib Trio insulation material fills the void between timber battens.
  4. The last layer from the interior side is formed by CSB panels, which are fixed on top followed by the clay plaster. This plaster is made out of earthen clay, hemp powder, pumice and sand.
  5. Flipping over the entire board, ISOBIO rigid panels (made out of commercial hemp and a thermosetting bio-based binder) are added on top of as the last external panel using screws. Finally they are followed by a hemp lime render which is the exterior finishing of the new building system.

Functions

The overall structure allows an even distribution with regards to the load-bearing capacity of the panel. The frame provides structural resistance to the whole system while maintaining the final structure as a single unit when the rest of the layers are added.

The OSB3 panel has an acoustic isolation similar to the wooden frame. It also has a low humidity content and low thermal conductivity. The BioFib Trio insulation is a material composed of hemp, flax, cotton fibers and thermoplastic fibers. Both the OSB3 panel and BioFib trio insulation materials provide high thermal insulation, thus providing comfort for residents during cold or hot seasons.

Another insulating material such as the Proclima intello membrane is used as a vapour check and airtightness barrier that prevents structural damage and mould formation in the system due to its high diffusion capacity. It is also non-toxic in nature, just like the other materials used to build this wall panel.

The CSB panels, which also increase the thermal insulation of the system, act as a moisture buffering layer while possessing while providing mechanical stability to the panel’s overall structure. The addition of the Clay plaster, as interior finishing layer, reinforced this property and added fire resistance properties to the system.

From the external side the combination of the ISOBIO rigid panel and the Hemp lime render acts as a fire retardant and improves hygrothermal properties, such as water repellency, protecting the system from the environmental effects and thus further preventing mould formation.


Impact

The overall panels for the new building are highly insulated, thus allowing rooms to be thermally stable during summer, winter or when the temperature outside abruptly changes. In addition, these panels are highly resistant to mould formation as they are highly diffusive in the presence of moisture. All these allow the houses to be breathable and energy efficient while providing optimal comfort for the residents once installed.

Is your home healthy? Ask the DNA

Genetic investigations are the latest tool for busting unsafe microorganisms and improving air quality in buildings

Usually associated with humid and sordid slums, mould is a frequent finding in wealthy homes too. Even the fanciest buildings may harbour hot spots where fungi and other microorganisms subtly proliferate, triggering problems that range from unpleasant smells to severe sickness.

Miia Pitkäranta, a Finnish molecular microbiologist, pioneered the use of DNA investigations to identify and study indoor microorganisms during her Ph.D. at the University of Helsinki. She later became a practitioner in the building industry, specialising in indoor air quality.

Pitkäranta is a member of the International Society of Indoor Air Quality and Climate (ISIAQ) and has contributed to updating the national guidelines on air quality in Finland. youris.com asked her about the fascinating world of microbes in buildings, their impact on our health and how DNA technologies are becoming a tool to improve the air quality of buildings.

 !cid_E45DC409-87B2-452C-99C3-BC3B5E75B1EB@homenet_telecomitalia

Which communities of microorganisms live in our homes and offices? Which of them need more attention?
Of course, it’s okay to find microorganisms in any building. Some come from outdoors, and many are yeasts or bacteria that are symbiotic with the users themselves or their pets. Nobody expects to live in a sterile environment. Problems arise when some microorganisms grow excessively. One of the first signs we look for when we investigate a building is the presence of mould and moisture because they are usually associated with microbial hot spots.

In a dry environment, microbes tend to lay dormant in the dust or on the surfaces. Dust is dirt, but it will go away when you ventilate or clean. Mould and moisture hot spots are entirely different ecosystems. Whereas dust is basically a collection of microorganisms that are already found in our bodies and in the outdoor dust, hot spots contain a few types of filamentous fungi, yeasts and bacteria that proliferate in moisture.

 

What problems are associated with indoor hotspots?
We have over 100 years of research showing that moisture and mould in buildings correlate with sickness. Many studies have associated them with asthma. I would say that asthma is the most studied symptom because it’s easier to identify. Other warning signs, such as eye irritation or dripping nose are even more widespread, but they are harder to quantify and record. There may be several mechanisms involved: direct toxicity, irritation, allergies.

However, it’s difficult to establish a clear cause and effect relationship, because the symptoms are also common to many other pathologies. Some research has linked moisture and mould to a series of non-specific symptoms: headaches, fatigue, dizziness, neurological or autoimmune disorders. We definitively need more research on the topic.

The term sick building syndrome (or SBS) was once used to include many health conditions linked to living indoors, but SBS is not considered an existing entity anymore. Today we believe there is not one syndrome associated with buildings as such, but rather a wide variety of agents and individual sensitivities that create an array of possible symptoms.

 

How can DNA be used to identify indoor microbes and what are the advantages?
The standard way to analyse a microbial hot spot is to take samples from it, cultivate the organisms in the laboratory and identify them with a microscope. One problem with cultivation is that you select only those species that can grow in the laboratory, and you lose the majority of the original biodiversity. By looking at the DNA instead, we identify directly which genomes, and therefore which species, are present.

DNA methods are faster than cultivation – they take days instead of weeks – and are non-selective. Another advantage of DNA methods is that they discriminate between single species, whereas with cultivation we usually identify microbes at the genus level, and each genus may include dozens of species. Today we know, for example, there are a lot of interesting species in indoor moulds that were underestimated with cultivation studies. As for any ecosystem, it’s important to know as much as possible about the diversity of species to understand how the community functions.

 

What is the outlook for these DNA methods?
DNA methods are so sensitive that, in theory, they could detect a mould and moisture hot spot even before it becomes apparent, and I think this is a very exciting prospect. We know that the health problems associated with microbial hot spots develop over time, possibly a couple of years.

By the time a user begins to perceive a mouldy or cellar-like smell (which is a common indicator of mould problem), some health condition could already have occurred. We also tend to get used to odours in our living environment, and we may not notice them until they get really bad. DNA tools are developing at an astonishing speed, but we need more basic research to interpret the findings. When you look at the microbial DNA in a building, there are plenty of background signals you have to deal with.

 

There is a growing demand for “green” biodegradable materials in buildings. Do you see any challenge regarding their interaction with microorganisms?
It’s astonishing to look at the diversity of building materials available today. Many are eco-friendly, which is a good thing. However, biodegradable materials, by definition, are easily spoiled by microorganisms, and that is why they are treated with various types of preservatives. It’s assumed that such treatments make materials resistant to microorganism attacks, but the question is: for how long? A building is expected to last many decades, and I think we need to get better knowledge about what kind of microbial community can develop in these materials in the long run.

Over time and given the right conditions, organisms may become tolerant of preservatives or break them down into other compounds. For example, during the 1950’s and up to the 1970’s many Scandinavian buildings were made with wood treated with pentachlorophenol (PCP) as a preservative. The industry believed that this treatment would withstand microbial attacks for the entire life span of the buildings, but today we see mould species that can break down PCP into compounds called chloroanisoles.

The process is slow and subtle; the wood does not look spoiled at all, but just a couple of nanograms of chloroanisoles per cubic metre are enough to produce a terrible mould or cork smell. We need to make sure that we are not going to see such phenomenon with today’s green materials in a couple of decades or so.

 

By Sergio Pistoi

Photo credits: Ivan Bachev

10 April 2017

A raincoat for our houses

From the use of Gore-Tex-like waterproof fabrics to the development of “breathable” bio-based materials, the construction industry is chasing breakthrough solutions to insulate buildings and keep living areas free from damp and mould

Today, one of the new challenges for the construction industry is the use of textiles, coming from the clothing and footwear industries. Gore-Tex-like membranes, which are usually found in weather-proof jackets and trekking shoes, are now being studied to build breathable, water-resistant walls. Tyvek is an example of one such synthetic textile being used as a “raincoat” for our homes.

Camping tents, which have been used for ages to protect against wind, ultra-violet rays and rain, have also inspired the modern construction industry, or “buildtech sector”. This new field of research focuses on the different fibres (animal-based such as wool or silk, plant-based such as linen and cotton and synthetic such as polyester and rayon) in order to develop technical or high-performance materials, thus improving the quality of construction, especially for buildings, dams, bridges, tunnels and roads. This is due to the fibres’ mechanical properties, such as lightness, strength, and also resistance to many factors like creep, deterioration by chemicals and pollutants in the air or rain.

“Textiles play an important role in the modernisation of infrastructure and in sustainable buildings”, explains Andrea Bassi, professor at the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering (DICA), Politecnico of Milan, “Nylon and fiberglass are mixed with traditional fibres to control thermal and acoustic insulation in walls, façades and roofs. Technological innovation in materials, which includes nanotechnologies combined with traditional textiles used in clothes, enables buildings and other constructions to be designed using textiles containing steel polyvinyl chloride (PVC) or ethylene tetrafluoroethylene (ETFE). This gives the materials new antibacterial, antifungal and antimycotic properties in addition to being antistatic, sound-absorbing and water-resistant”.

Rooflys is another example. In this case, coated black woven textiles are placed under the roof to protect roof insulation from mould. These building textiles have also been tested for fire resistance, nail sealability, water and vapour impermeability, wind and UV resistance.

Production line at the co-operative enterprise CAVAC Biomatériaux, France. Natural fibres processed into a continuous mat (biofib) – Martin Ansell, BRE CICM, University of Bath, UK

In Spain three researchers from the Technical University of Madrid (UPM) have developed a new panel made with textile waste. They claim that it can significantly enhance both the thermal and acoustic conditions of buildings, while reducing greenhouse gas emissions and the energy impact associated with the development of construction materials.

Besides textiles, innovative natural fibre composite materials are a parallel field of the research on insulators that can preserve indoor air quality. These bio-based materials, such as straw and hemp, can reduce the incidence of mould growth because they breathe. The breathability of materials refers to their ability to absorb and desorb moisture naturally”, says expert Finlay White from Modcell, who contributed to the construction of what they claim are the world’s first commercially available straw houses, “For example, highly insulated buildings with poor ventilation can build-up high levels of moisture in the air. If the moisture meets a cool surface it will condensate and producing mould, unless it is managed. Bio-based materials have the means to absorb moisture so that the risk of condensation is reduced, preventing the potential for mould growth”.

The Bristol-based green technology firm is collaborating with the European Isobio project, which is testing bio-based insulators which perform 20% better than conventional materials. “This would lead to a 5% total energy reduction over the lifecycle of a building”, explains Martin Ansell, from BRE Centre for Innovative Construction Materials (BRE CICM), University of Bath, UK, another partner of the project.

“Costs would also be reduced. We are evaluating the thermal and hygroscopic properties of a range of plant-derived by-products including hemp, jute, rape and straw fibres plus corn cob residues. Advanced sol-gel coatings are being deposited on these fibres to optimise these properties in order to produce highly insulating and breathable construction materials”, Ansell concludes.

 

By Chiara Cecchi

21 December 2016

The Social Life of Bricks

A celebrity in the materials world, Mark Miodownik dreams of colour-changing walls and looks at the future of renewable buildings

Mark Miodownik will never forget the day he became obsessed with materials. He was a schoolboy in 1985 when he was stabbed in the London Underground. “When I saw that weapon in the police station later, I was mesmerized. I had seen razors before of course, but now I realized that I didn’t know them at all. (…) its steel edge was still perfect, unaffected by its afternoon’s work,” he writes in his bestselling book Stuff Matters.

Growing up, Miodownik turned his fixation into a successful career. He became a materials scientist at the University College London, the director of the UCL’s Institute of Making and a widely known speaker and BBC presenter. His research interests include biomaterials, innovative manufacturing, and sensoaesthetics, a science that investigates the intricate relationship between people and the materials they use.

We asked Miodownik to share his views about the rediscovery of traditional materials in modern architecture, and how tomorrow’s buildings will cross the border between new and old technologies.

 

Do you think there is still value in using wood, straw, wool, or other traditional materials for buildings?
I don’t see being “traditional” as a value per se. The choice of materials has to be assessed with modern criteria, which include sustainability and energy consumption. If you ask me whether traditional materials are appropriate for modern buildings, I think the answer is yes. Partly because traditional materials have a portfolio of properties that are sometimes better than anything we have created recently: wool, for example, is a fantastic insulator.

Partly because it’s the whole ecosystem that matters. In the old days, the building materials we used were part of the landscape, and they were easier to recycle. New materials are not usually like that. When it comes to sustainability, traditional materials are often more efficient.

 

Construction experts point to limits in the public perception. Some described the three little pigs syndrome, a misconception by which buildings made with traditional materials, such as wood, would not be not as stable or durable as concrete. Is this vision widespread? And does our cultural background influence how we perceive materials?
There is no simple answer. Anthropological studies show that different cultures favour different materials, but the ways people relate to materials is extremely complex. The texture, the feel, the colour or even the imperceptible smell of an object can affect our emotional state. The materials we choose for our house, or the clothes we wear, not only represent us are but they also change how we are. Therefore, the materials we choose for a building can have subtle social consequences.

However, I don’t think that the “three little pigs syndrome” you describe is so widespread. People generally trust the engineers and rarely think about buildings collapsing, unless they live in an earthquake zone.

Rather, I believe that the influence of the global culture is predominant. People worldwide associate concrete, glass, and steel with modernity – think of the iconic image of a skyscraper – and this cuts across many cultures, especially in countries that are switching from rural to urban.

In the industrialised countries, I see much more of the opposite syndrome: many people don’t like concrete and are looking for alternative materials to build their homes.

 

My sports shoes have a new waterproof layer and a classic leather upper. Will buildings go the same way, layering technologies and crossing the border between old and new materials?
Doing this will require more interaction between experts from different industries, and I would like to see more of it. The construction sector is not very diverse in its approach, and I think we have a problem with asylum mentality in general, but real innovators will cross the boundaries between disciplines.

Textiles, for example, are fascinating for architects because they can do things that normal construction materials cannot do. You can see this with the lightweight pneumatic panels that cover many stadiums. Temporary structures are another sector that could benefit from innovative textiles. Millions of refugees need decent housing. Smart constructions made with resistant and lightweight fabric could be quickly sent, packed and reused.

In the future, building materials will be more diverse because people themselves are so diverse with their needs and desires, and constructions will reflect that.

 

You suggested replacing school libraries with workshops where students could get in contact with materials. Does a digital generation really need the physical experience of touching and feeling stuff?
I think the digital world is just one aspect of life. It clearly isn’t the answer to everything. Humans are physical beings; they need food, sleep and shelter from the weather. My radical proposal came after seeing the massive decrease in the facilities for learning with materials. For some schools, digital technology has been an excuse to reduce the resources for physical workshops because they are more expensive.

Whenever we introduce students to physical stuff they love it. And if we combine their digital skills with material knowledge, we can actually empower them. Professionals, too, need to cope with the wealth of new stuff. The number of materials from which designers can choose has almost quadrupled in the last 15 years.

This is why we are now seeing more materials libraries: facilities that collect samples so that designers and engineers can find out how materials could be used.

 

What would be your dream material for a building?
I’ve always fancied buildings that harvest their own energy. On a more immediate scale, I would like constructions to be thermochromic, meaning that they would change their colour with temperature.

Buildings could turn white in summer reflecting more sunlight, and thus reducing the need for cooling. And they could become darker in winter to absorb more heat and thus save energy.

Thermochromic glasses are already on the market. My laboratory developed a thermochromic brick about 10 years ago. We couldn’t get any company interested, but we showed that such a brick was possible.

This material makes total sense from an environmental perspective. As an extra, I would love to be in a city where the buildings change with the seasons.

 

By Sergio Pistoi

21 April 2016